Reynolds Goes Alloy: Are These the Best Value MTB Wheels for 2026?
The Fox 36 bent slightly after a front-wheel-first case into a rock garden. I figured it was done.
Six months later, same fork, still riding. The stanchion shows a faint mark where it took the hit. Performance hasnât changed. That tells you something about how Fox builds these things.
Quick Verdict
Aspect Rating Performance â â â â â Durability â â â â â Value â â â ââ Weight â â â â â Serviceability â â â â â Best for: Aggressive trail to enduro, rough terrain, high-speed chunk Skip if: Budget is tight, you ride smooth trails, or youâre under 150 lbs Weight: 1,895g actual (160mm travel, 29â) Price: $1,049 (GRIP2 damper) | $869 (GRIP damper)
Two full seasons in the Pacific Northwest. Heavy rotation on:
Setup: 2022 Trek Slash. Rider weight 185 lbs geared up.
Hereâs where the GRIP2 earns its money.
The low-speed compression damping separates from high-speed in a way the cheaper GRIP damper canât match. On sustained chatterâbraking bumps, small roots, embedded rocksâthe fork stays high in its travel and tracks. You feel connected to the ground instead of skipping across the top of it.
At speed, this translates to confidence. The fork absorbs what it should and holds firm when you need platform for pumping or manualing. The balance took me maybe three rides to find, then I stopped thinking about it.
The GRIP2âs high-speed compression circuit handles the violence well. Hard bottom-outs are rare unless I really mess up a line choice. The fork uses its travel progressivelyâI see full travel marks on aggressive days, but it doesnât feel like Iâm diving through the stroke.
Bottom-out resistance comes from the air springâs progression and the damperâs high-speed circuit working together. My previous fork (RockShox Pike) would blow through travel on the same hits. The 36 manages them better.
Letâs be honest: this fork weighs almost 1,900g. You feel it on long climbs.
But the GRIP2âs lockout is firm enough that the fork doesnât bob badly. I use the middle setting (trail mode) for most climbing and forget about it. The fork isnât holding me back on uphills, but a lighter XC fork would definitely be faster if climbing mattered most.
For my ridingâ80% descent focusâthe climbing trade-off is acceptable.
2,500 miles, multiple temperature ranges, wet and dry conditions. The fork performs the same today as it did at 500 miles. Iâve done two lower leg services (lube and oil) and one full rebuild (at 1,800 miles). Each time, performance returned to baseline immediately.
Fox forks have a reputation for this kind of consistency. Itâs deserved.
The GRIP2 damper has low-speed compression, high-speed compression, low-speed rebound, and high-speed rebound adjustments. Thatâs four knobs to dial in.
Some people call this overcomplicated. I call it useful. Different trails and conditions benefit from tweaking. A bike park day wants more low-speed compression than a techy climbing trail. Having separate adjustments means I can change one thing without affecting others.
The 36mm stanchions and Kashima coating handle hard cornering and g-outs without flex. Coming from a 35mm fork, the difference in front-end precision was immediate.
For riders who push hard into corners and load the fork under braking, this stiffness matters. For lighter riders on mellower terrain, itâs probably overkill.
1,895g is heavy for 2024. The new Fox 36 Factory is lighter (1,820g claimed), but this 2022 model is a boat anchor compared to comparable RockShox or DVO options.
If climbing matters, or if youâre building a lighter bike, this weight hurts.
$1,049 for the GRIP2 damper version. You can get a RockShox Lyrik Ultimate for $899. The DVO Diamond is $925.
Is the Fox better? Marginally. Is it $150 better? Thatâs harder to argue.
This is personal preference, but the stock air spring can feel harsh on very small bumps despite the damper sensitivity. I added volume spacers to increase progression, which helped big hits but didnât change the initial small-bump harshness.
Upgrading to a coil conversion (Push, Vorsprung, etc.) would address this, but now youâre adding more cost and weight to an already expensive, heavy fork.
After 2,500 miles:
The fork is tough. Not invincibleâIâve seen Fox 36 lowers crack on big impactsâbut tougher than most alternatives Iâve ridden.
Sag: 25-30% for trail, 20-25% for park Rebound: Start in the middle and adjust from there Compression: Low-speed around 8 clicks from open, high-speed 6-8 clicks from open Volume spacers: Stock or one added for more progression
Getting the air pressure right took a few rides. The fork feels better with slightly more sag than Iâd typically run, then progressiveness added via spacers.
Fox recommends 50-hour lower leg service, 200-hour full rebuild. In practice:
If you ride in wet conditions regularly, the 50-hour interval is real. I stretched to 80 hours once and the fork felt noticeably worse. Lesson learned.
The main competition. Direct comparison:
| Aspect | Fox 36 GRIP2 | RockShox Lyrik Ultimate |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 1,895g | 1,842g |
| Price | $1,049 | $899 |
| Damper adjustability | 4 circuits | 3 circuits |
| Small bump | Excellent | Very good |
| Big hit | Excellent | Excellent |
| Serviceability | Good (Fox-specific) | Good (common parts) |
The Lyrik is lighter, cheaper, and nearly as good. The Fox 36 has slightly better small-bump performance and more adjustability. For most riders, the Lyrik is the better value.
I chose the Fox because I wanted the extra damping control. Reasonable people choose the Lyrik.
Aggressive trail and enduro riders on rough terrain. The fork excels when youâre pushing speed through chunk. The small-bump sensitivity keeps you composed when things get rough.
Heavier riders (170+ lbs). The 36âs stiffness and air spring progression suit heavier riders well. Lighter riders wonât load the fork enough to appreciate the damperâs capabilities.
People who value adjustability. Four independent damping circuits let you tune precisely. If you like to fiddle and optimize, the 36 rewards the effort.
Budget-conscious riders. The Lyrik Ultimate at $150 less is 90% of the fork. The Marzocchi Z1 at $599 is 80% of the fork. Neither is a meaningful downgrade for most riding.
Light riders on mellow terrain. The forkâs stiffness and weight donât benefit riders under 150 lbs or those riding flow trails. Get something lighter.
People who donât maintain their gear. Fox forks need consistent service to perform. If you wonât do 50-hour services, buy something more forgiving of neglect.
The Fox 36 GRIP2 is an excellent fork that costs more than it needs to.
Performance is top-tier. Durability is proven. Adjustability lets you dial it for your terrain and preferences. If you want one of the best forks available and donât mind the price or weight, the 36 delivers.
But the competition has caught up. The Lyrik, Zeb, and DVO options are all close enough that paying the Fox premium requires wanting specifically what Fox offers: maximum adjustability and that particular GRIP2 damper feel.
Iâm keeping mine. But Iâd seriously consider the Lyrik if I were buying today.
Tested on 2022 Trek Slash, PNW trails, 2,500 miles over two seasons. Weight measured on our scale.