Reynolds Goes Alloy: Are These the Best Value MTB Wheels for 2026?
Two fingers on the lever, dropping into a steep chute Iâve ridden dozens of times. The old Maven had this specific trait where initial engagement required a deliberate squeeze before anything happened. A dead zone, then a wall of power. The B1 doesnât do that. The lever starts working sooner, and the power builds more gradually, almost linearly. Same raw stopping force at full pull. Completely different feel getting there.
Thatâs the SwingLink Gold cam, and after running these brakes on sustained technical descents, I think itâs the most meaningful brake modulation improvement SRAM has made since the original Maven launch.
Quick Verdict
Aspect Rating Modulation â â â â â Raw Power â â â â â Lever Feel â â â â â Value â â â â â Serviceability â â â â â Best for: Aggressive trail and enduro riders who want power with precision, not just power Skip if: Youâre happy with your current Maven feel and donât want to spend on refinement Weight: ~310g per caliper (Maven Ultimate, without rotor) Price: $69â$109 upgrade kit; $249â$349 complete lever/caliper | SRAM
Test brakes: SRAM Maven Ultimate B1 (front and rear), with SwingLink Gold cam Test period: Late February â early March 2026 Trails: Rocky, sustained descents with extended braking zones; steep tech with tight switchbacks; high-speed open flow Bike: Enduro build, 170mm front / 160mm rear Comparison: SRAM Maven A1 (original), Shimano XT 4-piston (same trails, same sessions) Rider weight: 180 lb geared up
I focused testing on situations where modulation matters most: long, steep descents where youâre on the brakes for 30+ seconds at a time, and tight technical sections where the difference between âenoughâ and âtoo muchâ braking force is the difference between cleaning a section and washing the front wheel.
The original Mavenâs SwingLink cam gave you power. Lots of it. But the engagement curve was aggressive. SRAMâs own data shows the lever breakaway force was around 8N. Thatâs the force required to get past the initial dead zone and start generating pad-to-rotor contact. Once past that threshold, power came on fast.
The B1âs SwingLink Gold cam drops that breakaway force to roughly 4.25N, nearly half. Thatâs not a subtle change in spec sheet terms, and it doesnât feel subtle on trail.
What it means in practice: on the old Maven, there was a perceptible gap between âlever is moving but nothingâs happeningâ and âthe brake is actively slowing you down.â You learned to work around it. Youâd pre-load the lever slightly before a section, or youâd accept the slight delay and ride accordingly. The B1 closes that gap. The lever starts generating braking force almost immediately when you pull it.
The power ramp changes too. Where the A1 went from nothing to a lot quickly, the B1 builds force more gradually through the lever stroke. You get the same maximum power at full pull (SRAM didnât reduce peak braking force), but the journey from zero to maximum is smoother and more controllable.
On sustained braking into a rutted, off-camber section where Iâd normally be pulsing the lever to avoid locking the front wheel, the B1 let me hold a consistent drag. I could maintain a precise amount of braking force without the on/off behavior Iâd adapted to on the A1. Thatâs modulation in the real-world sense, not the marketing sense.
The A1 Maven caliper used mixed piston sizes (19.5mm and 18mm), a common approach where larger pistons on the trailing side compensate for pad taper under heavy braking. It works, but it creates slightly uneven pad contact under light to moderate pressure.
The B1 switches to four identical 18mm pistons. Same total piston area (close enough to make no measurable difference in maximum force), but more even pad contact across the full rotor face. The practical result is more consistent bite feel, especially when feathering the brakes.
I noticed the difference most on rear brake feel. On moderate descents where Iâm dragging the rear lightly, the A1 had a slightly inconsistent zone where one side of the pad would engage before the other. Subtle, and most riders probably wouldnât identify it consciously, but it showed up as a vaguely âspongyâ initial feel. The B1âs even piston sizing cleans that up. The rear brake engagement feels firmer and more predictable from the first millimeter of pad contact.
This is where SRAM made a smart business move that also happens to be genuinely useful for riders. The SwingLink Gold cam and updated lever internals are available as a backwards-compatible upgrade kit.
Whatâs in the kit:
What it costs:
What it requires:
That last point matters. Brake bleeds are annoying, time-consuming, and easy to mess up. SRAM designed the B1 lever internals so the cam swap doesnât open the hydraulic system. Youâre removing and replacing mechanical components on the dry side of the lever body. If you can change a derailleur cable, you can do this.
I installed the kit on my A1 Mavens in about 8 minutes per side. The difference was immediate: the same modulation improvement I felt on the factory B1 brakes, on my existing calipers and lines. Given that a full Maven Ultimate lever retails for $249, the $69 upgrade kit is a significantly better value proposition for anyone already running Maven brakes.
One caveat: the upgrade kit gives you the SwingLink Gold cam improvement, but not the updated 4x18mm caliper pistons. If you want both changes, you need the full B1 caliper ($149) or the complete lever/caliper set. For most riders, the cam swap alone is the bigger improvement.
SRAM offers the B1 update across the Maven lineup, but the two main options split like this:
| Maven Ultimate B1 | Maven Silver B1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Lever blade | Carbon fiber | CNC-machined forged aluminum |
| SwingLink | Gold cam | Gold cam |
| Caliper | 4x18mm, forged | 4x18mm, forged |
| Reach adjust | Tool-free | Tool-free |
| Contact adjust | Yes | Yes |
| Weight (lever) | ~115g | ~130g |
| Price (set) | $349/wheel | $249/wheel |
Both get the SwingLink Gold cam. Both get the 4x18mm caliper. The $100 difference buys you the carbon lever blade and roughly 15g of weight savings per side. The carbon blade feels slightly stiffer under heavy pulls, but honestly, the difference is marginal. If youâre budgeting, the Silver B1 delivers the same braking performance.
Sustained braking on 10+ minute descents is where the modulation improvement pays off the most. I could hold a precise speed through extended rough sections without the fatigue that comes from constantly modulating an aggressive lever. My forearms were noticeably less pumped at the bottom of long runs compared to the A1.
Tight switchbacks on steep grade require delicate braking. Too much and you lock the front, too little and you overshoot the turn. The B1âs linear power delivery made it easier to hold exact braking force through slow, technical moves. The old Maven worked here too, but it required more mental effort to manage the lever.
At speed on open trails, the B1 and A1 feel more similar. When youâre grabbing the lever hard for a high-speed scrub, both deliver the same stopping force. The B1âs modulation advantage is less relevant when youâre just asking for maximum power.
The Maven B1 is still a Maven. That means:
The comparison most riders are making. Running both on the same trails, same sessions:
Shimano XT still has a slight edge in outright modulation feel at very low speeds â creeping over tech where you need the absolute minimum braking force. Shimanoâs servo-wave mechanism does this really well.
Maven B1 has more raw power available when you need it, and the gap in modulation between the two is now much smaller than it was with the A1. If I had to pick one word: the Shimano feels âsofterâ through the lever stroke, the Maven feels âfirmer.â Neither is objectively better. Itâs preference.
For riders who want maximum power with improved feel: Maven B1. For riders who prioritize soft, organic lever feel above everything: Shimano XT. The B1 narrowed this gap considerably.
If youâre already in the SRAM ecosystem (SRAM XX DH wireless drivetrain, SRAM hubs), staying with Maven makes the most sense for parts and service consistency.
Initial setup is standard SRAM fare. Reach adjust and contact point adjust are both tool-free. I run reach about two clicks in from maximum extension, contact point one click from the default. The B1âs improved initial engagement means I set my contact point slightly further out than I did on the A1 because the brake engages earlier in the stroke, so I donât need the pad as close to the rotor at rest.
Pad break-in took about two trail rides. The metallic pads SRAM ships are powerful once bedded but require patience. Donât expect full performance on the first descent.
Rotor compatibility is unchanged: standard SRAM CenterLine or CenterLine X rotors, or any 6-bolt rotor. I ran 200mm front, 180mm rear. If youâre a heavier rider or riding long alpine descents, the 220mm CenterLine X rotor is worth considering for heat management.
Maven A1 owners: The $69 upgrade kit is a no-brainer. Ten minutes of work, no bleed, and the modulation improvement is immediately noticeable. Best value upgrade in mountain bike brakes right now.
New brake shoppers: If youâve been on the fence between Maven and Shimano because of the Mavenâs aggressive initial engagement, the B1 addresses that specific complaint. Itâs worth testing.
Enduro and gravity riders: The combination of raw power and improved modulation makes the B1 one of the best options for riders who need both. Pair with a proper suspension setup and youâve got a confident descending platform.
Happy A1 owners whoâve adapted: If youâve dialed in your A1 lever feel and donât find the modulation limiting, the improvement may not justify the spend â especially at $149+ for the caliper upgrade.
XC and light-trail riders: The Maven is overkill. A 2-piston brake with less weight and complexity will serve you better. Put the money toward tires that match your terrain instead.
Shimano loyalists who prefer soft lever feel: The B1 closed the modulation gap, but Maven still has a firmer, more mechanical feel through the stroke. If you love Shimanoâs character, this wonât convert you.
The Maven B1 is the brake the original Maven should have been. Same power, dramatically better modulation, and SRAM was smart enough to make the key improvement available as a cheap, easy retrofit. The SwingLink Gold camâs 50% reduction in breakaway force isnât a marketing number â you feel it on the first pull.
The $69 upgrade kit is the standout here. For existing Maven owners, itâs the most impactful sub-$100 upgrade available in mountain biking right now. For new buyers, the B1 closes the modulation gap with Shimano while maintaining the raw power advantage that made the Maven the gravity brake of choice.
If youâre building up a new enduro rig or upgrading your current trail bikeâs braking setup, the Maven B1 deserves a serious look.
Tested on an enduro build, 170/160mm travel, rocky and steep technical terrain, late February through early March 2026. Weights are SRAM claimed specs.